The supervisor is that one that he looks, before any thing, to understand the reason of that act or situation where the school if finds. He must arrive to devagar, to know the reality with which goes to deal for, later, to plan what it goes to make. In this case the planning if becomes indispensable action so that the tasks well are executed. On this Jnior Hisses (1984, P. 109) says: When a supervisor, guarded or ostensive, intends to impose definitive behavior to a professor it denies with this practical the education that both intend to see promoted. The negation of the educative direction also happens when the professor opposes to consider it the perspectives of professional perfectioning that the supervisor it places to its disposal. One perceives that it must have understanding of both the sides so that the confidence is established. One of the great virtues that if supervisor today points with respect to the function is sensitivity, the capacity to understand and to place themselves in the place of the other aid in the formation work, over all when she has necessity of desconstruir concepts, habits and attitudes taken root in the professors.
The work of desconstruo of concepts badly elaborated throughout the time depends on the confidence transmitted to the professors, to show to them that the function of the supervision is to help them of a pedagogical point of view to improve its action. As one of the actions more discredited by the professor it is the PLANNING, the work of rescue for the credibility must be made with very well-taken care of and patience. The Procedural Dimension makes possible the supervisor to arrive when know-making, consists of finding ways to solve the problems found in the pertaining to school reality. What dumb the reality is exactly the practical one, therefore cannot to have distanciamento between practical theory and.