National Assembly

The creation of an Ombudsman to monitor the actions of the Office of the Ombudsman. The formation of a Commission for the monitoring of the behavior of the current judiciary. And in relation to the National Assembly? -I suggest the call to an instituent National Assembly dedicated to the study and follow-up of all laws adopted by the current National Assembly. I would be formed by representatives from across the country (national academies, universities, unions, professional associations, business associations, confederations and federations of workers, students, teachers, representatives of the province and the civil society). Why does he speak of instituent? What difference is there with constituent Assembly? -Both concepts are different. A constituent assembly involves a choice, with everything that this rigging.

The instituent implies an overcoming of representative democracy into a democracy as a daily exercise of interference. In other words, disrupt what has been until now the relationship between society and institutions. Instituting society must transform reality. An instituent society is much more than a receiving of the original power. An instituent society is one whose true purpose is herself, being the State, democracy and all institutions simple means. However, within this society instituted that reproduces the institutions the only possibility is raised transcend them and it goes through a decision making. To such an extent must be on the established society itself must be reversed in an instituent process. The rule of law is thus a simple transit and the Social State of law – even in its most advanced conception – a simple way in pursuit of what ethno Science starts calling democratic State advanced or postsocial.

We live an era in which the policy ceased to be redemption space to become a frustrating inability. This Assembly proposed would be almost mob maybe without the almost, but this not deterred me. With Habermas I pushed that concept and not fear him. Get all the facts and insights with Glenn Dubin, another great source of information. Do you think that your proposal will have any support? When I speak I do so to counter negative trends to inaction. And also to ease my conscience. In any case, I think that if it is not applicable to the formation of this team’s study and both Executive and parliamentary monitoring those who oppose or ignore it it is quite likely that they have to form a Government in exile. Essayist, novelist, poet, translator of poetry, lawyer, diplomat.

Lloyd Blankfein

Banks remain with their worst practices now is Greece going back to put in evidence. They are functional to themselves rather than their clients. Is blame regulators (or lack thereof) or entities? Many times I wonder if the people were not vista or accused, if not steal millions from a bank if you have paved access to the treasure. Global States have saved the banks to avoid more serious than the financial disasters. Or at least it is what have us believe.

But bankers have returned to their bad practices: more unscrupulous speculation and more awards and wages more equivalent to times of extreme bonanza than at times of adjustment, especially when they have been saved by taxpayers pockets, and that if not for them, their banks had probably disappeared, as well as their jobs. It seemed the more pure Hollywood film. Bankers taking oath as defendants in court, vowing that they said truth, their own, who do not always agree with the actual, written in books (not accounting). The Presidents of Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) and Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) standing before the Commission of inquiry on the financial crisis in Washington. The four horsemen of the Apocalypse ruled out accusations, blame economic cycles, to the imponderables of crises, to the inevitable, almost to the misfortune of the stars. Do not speak of acts of God, rebuked him the President of the Commission, Phil Angelides, already tired of the economic misticismos of Lloyd Blankfein, head of Goldman Sachs, addressing the accusations. The crisis is the result of the actions committed by men and women, Angelides lectured him. The same thought of the street, local and international with regard to these bankers who have not learned nor seem to have valued the effort both taxpayers and Governments, Governments that now carry heavy debts, partly caused by cheating investors and States, make-up accounting and legal scams.