To look a fixed bond of influence of other thinkers on Weber, revealed a task impossible to be carried through; nor therefore, however, improfcua: many works had been produced on the basis of an association of the workmanship of Weber however to a probable influence of Simmel, however to a not less probable influence of Rickert, Nietzsche, Dilthey and as much others. This test that none of them can intend to have reason how much to a direct entailing of the workmanship of Weber the conceptions of some of these authors. Thus, of when in when, according to convenience of clarification of pertinent questions to the objectives of this work, could be presented position of affinity or rejection of Weber it stops with subjects and conceptions that were also objects of other authors. nvestors contributes greatly to this topic. Two sides of one same currency will have of being observed, therefore: all cultural phenomenon will only be able to become object of analysis from its direction and meaning. Thus the individual actions of the social actors occur also for all. Exactly the calls collective entities, as classrooms, layers and congregations, only can adequately be analyzed from the individual directions of acting of that they compose such collective entity.

These, for Weber, are for itself same incapable of action. Thus, the capacity human being to act significantly, to pursue a direction when it acts, later implies the possibility of its action to be interpreted with regard to such direction/meant. The other side of the currency consists of the transposition of this conclusion the properly epistemolgico domain: also the scientist, when she makes science, acts significantly. In this measure, the actions and conclusions of the scientist cannot follow the reality of the things through a description, but they remain interpretations, repletas with the present time of that it interprets. The conscience of that the world, the life and the existence can lock up different interpretations in different cultures, results in the conscience of that it does not have one interpretation-in-itself.

The piscador is if communicating e, in fact, if communicating of one it forms needs and special, deliberately, to somebody in particular, to contract the eyelid and to blink while what it only has one tique nervous it executed one contracted the eyelid. To contract eyelids on purpose, when a public code exists in which to act thus means a signal conspiratrio, is to blink. It is everything that has the respect: a particle of behavior, a signal of culture and voil! one gesto.’ ‘ (GEERTZ, 1989) the concern with the hermeneutics, through the significao acts, will give to this author has detached enters the theoreticians German of Cultural History. In Brazil, in the last decades, the workmanship of Geertz comes expressivamente being deals and interpreted, as allied of the new historiogrficas constructions. Burke in its book ‘ ‘ What it is Cultural History; ‘ 200 years in Germany it already was practised, had histories on determined human groups, regions nations. The term culture was each more employed time in the Europe, mainly in the conflituosas questions between the Church and the State, as it happens in Germany in 1870 in a known conflict as ' ' the fight for cultura' ' or ' ' war cultural' '. What it happens is the division of cultural history at four moments, where the first one would be the classic phase, portraying subjects renascentistas, worried in studying the connections between the different arts, when interpreting paintings, poems, among others, searched evidences of the culture and the period where they had been produced, arriving itself thus at the study of the culture of a people. After that the focus for social history was changed of the art, where many historical contributions had come of sociologists as Max Weber, quesegundo Burke, works with the question of the cultural roots of the dominant economic system in the Europe Occidental person and America, workmanship intitled of ' ' The Protestant Ethics and Capitalista&#039 spirit; ' , that it had as main axle to present a cultural explanation for the economic changes. .

The question of the ships German confiscated by Brazil also was decided by Treated to Versailles 24. This problem appeared in 13 of April of 1917 when Brazil declared that, by measure of security, it would be taken ownership of the ships German that were in Brazilian ports, this was made not only by confiscating, more yes in the direction to make with that Germany stopped of torpedear the Brazilian boats. These ships had been under the cares of the navy department. in 2 of June of 1917 Brazil, for a reason or purpose retaliation, took these ships in substitution the tonnage that had been destroyed for the Germans. The Brazilian government, after analyzing and evidencing that it would not be very useful to have these ships in its ports (had the face and delayed maintenance and the impossibility of use of the same ones in coastal navegation), more good found to give to some utility to the ships former-Germans for does not leave them motionless in the ports, then in 3 of December of 1917 the Treasury department was authorized to freight 30 of the 46 ships former-Germans for France.

Dficits had diminished, increasing the transport, even so not in the speed that the country needed to take care of to the development. Towns had appeared the side of the railway line, bringing economic development, coming of immigrants for the state, given of census of the time where the development is mentioned to it, agricultural establishments in great amount if install destining a farming growth and in agriculture, sprouting of small properties with land appropriation, but in the majority it was of great properties, were of high values the properties that passed the railway lines. The advantages of the installation of the railway line were of the activities in the urban way, numerous urban population, deal, in the city of Campo Grande where it had the highest urban growth, other city as Aquidauana, Miranda, Ribas of the Medium brown River, Clear Water, Terenos and Three Lagoons, Sidrolndia that had appeared in function of the Railway line. Bad luck of the Northwest in Mato Grosso were the character politician therefore prepare interests politicians whom they determined, the rapidity of its construction, distance of the dynamic polar regions (SP, RIO DE JANEIRO), large state (properties) the colonists who came in diamond search. In 1969 the RFFSA grouped its railroads in regional systems, being the renomeada Northwest 10 Division the Northwest, tied with the Regional System Center-South, with headquarters in So Paulo, SP. In 1976 important reorganization occurred new, being 10 renomeada Division the Northwest SP – Supervision of Bauru Production, still integrated to the SR4, with headquarters in So Paulo, but later desmembrada as 4,2 SR10 – Regional Supervision Bauru, with the headquarters in Bauru. When at the beginning of the decade of 1990 the federal government included the RFFSA in the desestatizao process, dividing it in meshes, the SR10 started to constitute the Mesh West, being been the first one to be auctionzed, in day 5 of March of 1996.

The Device Castle enters in this also contests and it feels the crisis of close, therefore already she was being difficult to more export its product to the Bahia and not vendia to Rio De Janeiro. The production starts to fall and starts to reflect in the resignations of the employees. The crisis affected Luzia Saint of the Itanhi in this new period to the few, and passing this crisis of the sugar sugar cane that occurred in the year of 1960, after to have last this bad commercial time the producers of the sugar cane start to substitute this activity for that they were giving good profits that she was the cattle one and the cocoicultura. It was evidenced that in the year of 1980 when the coconut was in high, was transferred to give space to it and to produce the citricultura, thus brightening up the fall in the production of the sugar sugar cane. As it was observed, they are some natural competitors who appear to compete and to take the space of the sugar cane.

The consequence of this was that the device owners who not yet had closed the plants start to see that the sugar is not more viable for they and starts to abandon this negotiates and changes the device for the cattle one, for citricultura for the plantation of coconuts visualizing more profits and little work that to plant to cut, to manufacture and to vender the sugar. Moreover, with this new enterprise it would diminish the number of employees. The Device Castle was not different, also it adjusted itself to the new businesses of this period and its new proprietor started to use lands for the cattle one. in the end of century XIX the economy of the sugar sugar cane starts to fall and to be without value each time more, and was this product that made the city to evolve economically in the city of Luzia Saint.